The Spectacular Nature of the Election Campaign in Georgia Abstract

Giorgi Melikidze

Abstract


the last quarter of the 20th century the world party system and its political campaign have suffered important changes and the process Americanization began. The majority of the Western European parties are based on the solid ideological basis and representation of the interests of electorate. In the new democracies political parties are characterized with weak organization and special personalization. Moreover, in these countries the fragile ideological grounds of political parties conditioned spectacular character of election campaign. Researchers term such modification of election campaign “Carnivalization”.

The present paper aims to determine how political personification determines spectacular character of the electoral campaign. In the 1990s the weak representation of the Georgian political parties has plaid determining role in terms of transformation of political campaign. Therefore, after the Rose Revolution of 2003 the “Carnivalization” process of election campaign became active. The study is based on the following qualitative research methods: a). Expert interviews with political consultants; b). In-depth interviews with representatives of political parties; g). In-depth interviews with the selected electorate.


Full Text:

PDF

References


მშვიდობის, დემოკრატიის და განვითარების კავკასიური ინსტიტუტის ანგარიში, (2008). წამყვანი ტელევიზიები და წინასაარჩევნო პერიოდი საქართველოში მედია(ზე)მოქმედებაში, CIPDD.

Bader, (2007), Making parties fit for democracy: Georgia, Ukraine and the Challenge for democracy assistance. Opleidging Europese Studies, Universiteit van Amsterdam. მოძიებული 18 იანვარი, 2015

Bader, M. (2010). Against All odds; Aiding Political Parties in Georgia and Ukraine. Amsterdam University Press.

Blondel. J., Thiebalt, Jean-Louis (2009). Political leadership, parties and citizens: The personalization of leadership; Routledge. Retrived 29 January, 2015http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13532944.2012.752977#.VdW_qhSqpBc

Caspi, D. (1996), ,,American-Style Electioneering In Israel: Americanization versus Modernization,” Mancini, Paolo – Swanson, David (Eds.), Politics, Media and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences, Praeger Publications, London.

Darchiashvili, M. (2008), Transition of Georgian State Television in to the Public Broadcaster. Central European University.

Jaward, P. (2012), Elections and Treatment of the Oppostionin Post-Soviet Georgia. In: Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Frames of Rule in the Post-Soviet Space, (ed). Susan Stewart.

Freedom House, 2002, Nations in Transit, Georgia, Independent Media; Freedom House, 2003, Nations in Transit, Georgia; Freedom House; Nations in Transit – Georgia, 2008; Nations in Transit - Georgia, 2012. Retrieved : 7/03/2015 https://freedomhouse.org/report/nationstransit/2013/georgia#.VdMWiRSqpBc

Kovach, B. and Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The Elements of Journalism. Crown/Archetype.

Markozashvili, L., (2014), Transition toward Democracy – Georgia problems. In: Przeglad Politologiczny 3(14). moZiebuli 30 marti, 2015

McAllister, I. (2007), ,,The Personalization of Politics,” in: R. J., Dalton and Klingemann, Hans- Dieter (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavoiur. Oxford Handbooks Online. Retrived 7 March, 2015 http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199270125

Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z.M. and Clawson, R. A., (1997a), Toward a psychology of framing effects. In: Political behavior. 19 (3). moZiebuli 19 marti, 2015 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/209410295 _Toward_a_ Psychology_of_Framing_Effects

Nodia, G., Scoltbach, A. P. Coordinators – Editors; (2006). The Political Landscape of Georgia; Political Parties: Achievements, Challenges and Prospects. Eburon Uitgeverij B.V.

Olson, D. M. and Iionszki, G. (2012), Post-Communist Parliaments Change and Stability in the Second Decade. Routledge.

Rahat, G., Sheafer, T. (2007), The personalization(s) of Politics: Israel 1949-2003. The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem.

Tarkhan – Mouravi, G. (2006). Politicheskie Partii v Gruzii. Zatiunuvsheesia Stanovlenie. In: Political Science Quarterly 1;

Von Alest, D., Sheafer, T. and Sheafer, T. and Stanyer, J. (2012), The Personalization of mediatied political Communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings, in: Journalism 13(2). moZiebuli 17 Tebervali, 2015 https: //www.academia.edu/1513659/The_personalization_of_mediated_political_communication_A_review_of_concepts_operationalizations_and_key_findings

Webb, P. and Poguntke, T. (2005), ,,The Presidentialization of Contemporary Democratic Politics: Evidence, Causes and Consequences.” In: Poguntke, T. and Webb, P., The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative study of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Press.

Wheatley, J. (2005), Georgia from national awakening to Rose Revolution: delayed transition in former Soviet Union. Ashgate, Aldershot.

Wolinetz, B. (2002), Beyond the Catch-all Party: Approaches to the study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies, in: Gunther, R., Montero, J. R. and Linz, J. J., Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2449-2833 (online)

ISSN: 2449-2825 (print)