The Influence of Cinematography on the Formation of Antireligious Consciousness of the Georgian Society (the Soviet times)
Abstract
Artists, fascinated with the revolutionary ideas, became ghost-writers and created new works dedicated to this change. The Communist Party particularly stressed the importance of the “Engineers of Souls” – i.e. the role of writers in fighting against religion. The slogans and appeals of party leaders delivering anti-religious messages had to be transformed into their works for remembrance by the mass society. Lenin’s famous saying – “of all the arts the most important for us is the cinema” – had imperative importance. Therefore, cinematographers tried to reflect the process of formation of Communism through their works. The new era of the Soviet arts was launched. The cinema, as the tool of censorship, kept its eye on minor details that were incompatible with the Soviet ideology. Every scenario went through a detailed review before production, as it should have reflected the ideology of the Communist Party and highlighted the predominance of the Soviet way of life.
The documentary cinema was particularly valued, as it was a kind of a chronicle of the Soviet life. The anti-religious themes had particular importance in the cinema production, as profanities were considered as the party directives: for the creation of a particular stereotype of clergy the following methods were extensively applied – satire, pamphlet, humor, template – and widely promoted through the cinema production. These should have inhibited distrust, disrespect, cynical attitudes, aggression and hate towards the clerics among the Soviet persons, as the resulted antipathy should have lasted long among spectators. The Soviet cinematography produced a number of movies in this line: “Khabarda,” “Lost Paradise,” “Magdana’s Lurja,” “Londre,” “Adventures of Lazare,” “The Wishing Tree,” etc. The clerics depicted in these movies differ from one another in their appearance, behavior, speeches and attitudes towards human beings; although they share one particular characteristic, which was predetermined by the Soviet regime: it was necessary to reflect degeneracy of humankind – futility, hypocrisy, acquisitiveness and irreverence. This anti-religious inertia lasted until the 1980s and laid the foundation for the emergence of new trends in the reflection of this problem.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ახალი აღთქუმაჲ. თბილისი. 1995
ბაქრაძე, აკ. მწერლობის მოთვინიერება. თბილისი. 1990
ბაქრაძე, აკ. კინო, თეატრი. თბილისი. 1998
ბოლტიანსკი, გ. ,,ლენინი და კინო“. მოსკოვი. 1925
გაზ. ,,საქართველოს რესპუბლიკა“. თბილისი. 2015. ნ238
თიკანაძე, რ. ქართული კინო, პრობლემები, ძიებანი. თბილისი. 1978
ლენინი ვ. თხზულებები. ტ.1. თბილისი. 1919
ლენინი ვ. თხზულებები. ტ.17. თბილისი. 1960
ლუარსამიძე, ვ. ჟურნ. ,,პროლეტარული მწერლობა“. თბილისი. 1931. ნ1-2
მარქსი კ., ენგელსი ფ. კომუნისტური პარტიის მანიფესტი. თბილისი. 1954
მუშიშვილი, გრ. ჟურნ. ,,მნათობი“. 1928. ნ8
ჟორდანია, ნ. წიგნი ოჯახში საკითხავი. თბილისი. 1989
ჟრენტი, ო. თბილისი ქართულ კინოში. თბილისი. 2010
ჟურნ. ,,ქართული მწერლობა“. თბილისი. 1928. ნ5
რატიანი, ი. ქართული მუნჯი კინო. თბილისი. 1976
სკკპ XXII ყრილობის მასალები. თბილისი. 1961
Herbert Marshal McLuhan. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Ney York. 1964
Бердиаев, Н. О рабстве и свободе человека. Париж. 1939
Бухарин, Н. Классовая борьба и революция. Москва. 1919
Бессмертный, А. Кино и общество. Веб.стр. Psyfactor.org
Гращекова, И. Советская кинорежиссура. Москва. 1982
Дзиган, Е. Путь к сердцу зрителя. Москва. 1974
Данелия, Г. ,,Чито-гврито“. Москва. 2007
Лоск, Н. Журн. ,,Путь“. Париж. 1926. N2
Ленин, В. Полное собрание сочинений. Т.5. Москва. 1967 Пельше, Р. Нравы и искусство Французской Революции“. Петербург. 1919
Ортега-и-Гассет, Х. Восстание масс. Журн. ,,Вопросы философии“. Москва. 1930. N3-4
Климова, Л. Массовый человек как феномен массовой культуры, его свойства характерные
черты. Веб.стр. SuperInf.ru. 24.05.2012
Чернов, Г. Сущность культурцентристкого (ортегианского) подхода к массовым явлениям.
Веб.стр. Psyfactor.org
Ленин, В. Последние писма и статьй. Москва. 1980